Minimally invasive calcaneus fracture treatment
Sinus Tarsi Approach to
Financial Disclosure
Calcaneus Fracture
Evolution or Revolution
Marc J. Michaud MD
New Hampshire Orthopaedic Center
January 24, 2014
Calcaneus Fractures
Eric M. Bluman, MD, PhD
Most common tarsal bone
Assistant Professor
Harvard Medical School
1-2% of all bone fractures
Lew C. Schon, MD
Typically from an axial
load: Fall from height
Union Memorial Hospital
Fracture does not involve the
Anterior Process
Joint Depression
Posterior facet remains
Sustentaculum Tali
attached to the calcaneus
Peroneal Tubercle
Sander's Classification
Orthopaedic Trauma Protocols: Hansen/Swiontkowski
Posterior Calcaneal
Sander's Classification
Joint Depression
S Type I- Non-displaced
S Type II/III- have 2 and 3
fragments that are medial or
Posterior facet impacted into
lateral and subdivided into
the body of the calcaneus
primary and secondary fracture lines.
S Type IV- Severely comminuted
Orthopaedic Trauma Protocols: Hansen/Swiontkowski
Historical Treatment
Historical Treatment
1720 Petit and DeSault in France. First accurate description of treatment of calcaneus fractures.
1948 Palmer Unsatisfied with non-operative and late treatment. Advocated acute treatment through Kocher approach
1908 Cotton and Wilson: Operative treatment contra-indicated
S Patients did "wel " and many returned to work
S Recommended closed treatment with a medially placed
1952 Essex-Lopresti:
sandbag and a hammer to to reduce the lateral wall.
S Tongue-type: percutaneous reduction
S Reimpact" the fracture
S Joint Depression: ORIF
1931Bohler: Advocated operative treatment but technical
1993 Benerschke and Sangeorzan: Surgical treatment with
extensile lateral approach, rigid internal fixation, early motion.
Infection, malunion, non-union, need for amputation
With CT scans, IV antibiotics, fluoroscopy, AO/ASIF techniques, and better anesthesia there has been a trend toward more
1943 Gallie: Subtalar arthrodesis as definitive treatment for
aggressive surgical intervention
healed, malunited fractures.
Indications for Operative
Extensile Lateral Approach
CONTRAINDICATIONS
S Palmer and Letournel
S Severely comminuted fracture
S Substantial depression
S Impaired vascularity
S Widening of the heel
Full Thickness Flap that protects
S Extension into posterior facet
S Severe neuropathy or IDDM
S Peroneal tendons
with displacement of > 2 mm
S Unable to be non-weight
S ? Vascular supply
Associated Complications
High Complication Rate
Wound complications occur in up
to 25% of surgically treated
calcaneal fractures
Berschke &Kramer
Extensile Approach
(2003)JOT 17:241
(2011)Foot Ankle Surg 17:233
Tips To Avoid Complications
S Allows swelling to go down
S Fracture starts to heal
S Bony reabsorption
Why is this area such a
S Extensile approach requires making incisions just
Three dimensional blocks of tissue
Understanding their boundaries
proximal to the arteries supplying the flap
fed by source arteries
and anastomoses provides the basis for designing incisions and
S Little to no underlying muscle to fall back on
exposures that preserve blood supply
First described by: Tayor and Palmer, Br.J.Plast.Surg (1990) 43:1
Popularized by: Attinger, Plast. Reconstr. Surg.(2006)117.261S
Angiosomes of the Foot
-main vascular supply to a given angiosome
Supply vessels which link adjacent angiosomes to one another
Provide safety conduit that allows a given angiosome to provide blood flow to an adjacent angiosome
Peroneal Angiosome
Peroneal Angiosome
Lateral heel is the lateral border of the peroneal angiosome which is fed by the fibular (peroneal) artery, a branch of posterior tibial artery
With a calcaneal fracture the choke vessels between the peroneal and anterior tibial angiosomes may not have time to open up
An incision above the glaborous juncture leaves intervening tissue between the incision and lateral border of the peroneal angiosome in
May take longer in the traumatic setting of soft tissue damage and inflammation
Rational for the Sinus Tarsi
Initial Management
S Always associated with soft
S Measure compartment pressure
if pain out of proportion
S Evaluate type of fracture
S Lateral displacement
S Varus alignment
S Joint Depression
S Assess displacement of facet
S Check for associated mid foot
Confirms posterior facet fracture complexity
and calcaneal-cuboid injuries
Evaluate the relationship of the sustentaculum tali
Calcaneal-cuboid joint displacement
Lateral position
S Bulky Jones dressing/splint/elevate
Thigh Tourniquet
S Operate when skin lines present
Stable platform with folded blankets
S Usually 5-7 days
Prep/Drape entire leg
S Longer when fracture blisters
S Open fractures managed acutely
Tools of the Trade
Standard approach to sinus tarsi
S Extend towards base of 4th
S Visualize calcaneal-cuboid joint
Elevate extensor digitorum brevis
Debride hematoma and small
fracture fragments
Enter peroneal tendon sheath
Reduce Anterior Calcaneus
Fix calcaneal-cuboid joint if
Elevate and protect tendons
Sub periosteal dissection of lateral wall with periosteal elevator
Pin anterior calcaneus to sustentaculum tali
Open a portion of lateral wall and examine the posterior facet
Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Keith L Moore
Reduce Posterior Tuberosity
Restore calcaneus tuberosity to sustentaculum tali: shortened and in varus
With 4 mm Schanz pin: placed lateral or posterior
Apply plantar and valgus directed force
Translate medially
Orthopaedic Trauma Protocols: Hansen/Swiontkowski
Manual Traction Over a Bump
Translate Medially
Intraoperative Axial View
Provisional Fixation
Progress medial to
Sustentaculum tali is
constant fragment
Restore Gissane's angle
Master Techniques in Orthopaedic Surgery The Foot and Ankle, Kitaoka
Reduce Posterior Facet
Cannulated Screws to Facet
Place into subchondral
Place laminar spreader
Freer elevator and dental pick
bone of posterior facet
"Trampoline Screw"
Visualize sustentaculum tali
Elevate depressed fragments
Slide plate onto bone
Contour plate
S I use allograft cancellous bone
chips for large voids
Make sure it is sitting
Slide plate onto bone
Robert Jones Type Dressing
S Irrigation and hemostasis
S 2-0 absorbable for deep tissue
S Close subQ with 4-0
S Close skin with vertical
mattress stitches
S Ice and elevate
S Remove drain after 1 day
Fall from ladder
S Remove splint after 10-14 days
S Apply cast or boot
Joint depression
S Remain NWB until healed,
typically 6-10 weeks
2.5 months post-op
Source: http://www.nhmi.net/pdf/Michaud_Calcaneus.pdf
Oncogene (2016), 1–11© 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/16 ORIGINAL ARTICLEEWS-FLI1-mediated suppression of the RAS-antagonistSprouty 1 (SPRY1) confers aggressiveness to Ewing sarcoma F Cidre-Aranaz1, TGP Grünewald2,3, D Surdez2, L García-García1, J Carlos Lázaro1, T Kirchner3, L González-González1, A Sastre4,P García-Miguel4, SE López-Pérez1, S Monzón1,5, O Delattre2 and J Alonso1
Application of Basic Science to Clinical Problems: Traditional vs. Hybrid Problem- Based LearningAmber N. Callis, D.D.S., M.S.; Ann L. McCann, R.D.H., Ph.D.; Emet D. Schneiderman, Ph.D.; William J. Babler, Ph.D.; Ernestine S. Lacy, D.D.S.; David Sidney Hale, D.D.S., M.S.D.Abstract: It is widely acknowledged that clinical problem-solving is a key skill for dental practitioners. The aim of this study was to determine if students in a hybrid problem-based learning curriculum (h-PBL) were better at integrating basic science knowl-edge with clinical cases than students in a traditional, lecture-based curriculum (TC). The performance of TC students (n=40) was compared to that of h-PBL students (n=31). Participants read two clinical scenarios and answered a series of questions regarding each. To control for differences in ability, Dental Admission Test (DAT) Academic Average scores and predental grade point aver-ages (GPAs) were compared, and an ANCOVA was used to adjust for the significant differences in DAT (t-test, p=0.002). Results showed that h-PBL students were better at applying basic science knowledge to a clinical case (ANCOVA, p=0.022) based on overall scores on one case. TC students' overall scores were better than h-PBL students on a separate case; however, it was not statistically significant (p=0.107). The h-PBL students also demonstrated greater skills in the areas of hypothesis generation (Mann-Whitney U, p=0.016) and communication (p=0.006). Basic science comprehension (p=0.01) and neurology (p<0.001) were two areas in which the TC students did score significantly higher than h-PBL students.